Some criticism of the Mono Lake results

Here’s a post from DNA researcher Rosie Redfield critically analyzing the paper that was released in Science and announced by NASA on Thursday regarding aresenic-tolerant bacteria in Mono Lake.  I haven’t read the paper myself (I don’t have a Science subscription) and have been relying on news reports, but reading the review certainly casts doubt on the significance of these results.  I suppose that we’ll have to wait for Science to publish her letter and for the authors to respond.

Hat tip: John Hawks


Razib Khan points to two more posts discussing the topic, which I’ll pass along.  The first is a post by Alex Bradley which echos some of the concerns of Dr. Redfield and adds some insight of his own.  The second is a critique of the media response to this story done by David Dobbs.  Both are good reads that explain the situation nicely.


About Meng Bomin

Real name Benjamin Main, I am a graduate of Grinnell College with a degree in Biological Chemistry.
This entry was posted in Astronomy, Science and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Some criticism of the Mono Lake results

  1. Pingback: If a California lake yields an arsenic-based bacterium, what lurks in ithe Gowanus Canal? | Peculiaris

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s