Some criticism of the Mono Lake results

Here’s a post from DNA researcher Rosie Redfield critically analyzing the paper that was released in Science and announced by NASA on Thursday regarding aresenic-tolerant bacteria in Mono Lake.  I haven’t read the paper myself (I don’t have a Science subscription) and have been relying on news reports, but reading the review certainly casts doubt on the significance of these results.  I suppose that we’ll have to wait for Science to publish her letter and for the authors to respond.

Hat tip: John Hawks


Razib Khan points to two more posts discussing the topic, which I’ll pass along.  The first is a post by Alex Bradley which echos some of the concerns of Dr. Redfield and adds some insight of his own.  The second is a critique of the media response to this story done by David Dobbs.  Both are good reads that explain the situation nicely.

About these ads

About Meng Bomin

Real name Benjamin Main, I am a graduate of Grinnell College with a degree in Biological Chemistry.
This entry was posted in Astronomy, Science and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Some criticism of the Mono Lake results

  1. Pingback: If a California lake yields an arsenic-based bacterium, what lurks in ithe Gowanus Canal? | Peculiaris

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s